Skip to content
APPLICATION ANSWERS · GOLD CARD FIELD GUIDE

Can we subtract an earlier donation from the published program charges for a Chatham-Kent applicant?

Sources checked:

THE DIRECT ANSWER

Do not assume a credit exists. Use the current official charges and applicable arrangement rather than a private calculation based on unrelated payments. Current published amounts are US$15,000 nonrefundable processing per person, then a US$1 million individual principal or US$2 million corporate principal gift after successful vetting. Each eligible joining family member adds US$15,000 and US$1 million, including corporately.

Prepare a program-specific budget

Distinguish the nonrefundable processing fee, required government gift after successful vetting, professional costs and family steps. Verify payment instructions and avoid treating a charitable tax receipt as a program discount. Any tax treatment of a separate donation is a different question for a qualified adviser, not a reduction inferred from immigration marketing. Corporate terms describe 1% annual maintenance and a 5% transfer fee including a new DHS background check. Reuse of a prior corporate principal gift under the official process is not automatic approval of a replacement employee. Additional State Department and medical costs may apply; verify current instructions for the actual proposal.

Gold Card is not a conventional visa. Its required payment is made by the applicant to the U.S. government under the official process, and it does not replace the separate EB-1 or EB-2 eligibility, admissibility, and visa-availability requirements. A first review should separate the official payment path from immigration eligibility and from any commercial proposal offered to the applicant. Preserve the current official instructions, payment confirmation, identity records, and the evidence for the underlying EB category. Verify the required sequence before money moves. A receipt from a private intermediary, or an assumption that a payment alone creates residence, does not settle either the gift-payment question or the separate immigration decision. Hypothetical example: A freight-analytics executive is offered a package combining a private advisory charge with an asserted government amount. An itemized recipient table and official payment instruction distinguish the applicant-to-gift payment from private services and later immigration fees. The practical next step is to preserve the underlying record, identify any conflict in writing, and decide the sequence from the facts rather than from a preferred outcome.